From: Ochal Christophe <ochal@kefren.be>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.15-rc7: known regressions
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 19:30:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1136226637.7602.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200601021838.38310.ak@suse.de>
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 18:38 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Monday 02 January 2006 18:23, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > Would you veto against a section "known regressions" in the final 2.6.15
> > announcement listing this issue with a link to the Bugzilla bug?
>
> Yes for this case. The original was likely so fragile that it might
> break only with minor changes in the hardware configuration.
>
> In general listing known regressions is a good idea though.
>
> It might be a good idea to give them different priorities though - e.g.
> a broken BIOS with a missing workaround is less priority than
> a pure Linux bug.
I'm currently struggling with a probable case of broken BIOS without
workaround, is there a central repository of known simular problems? Is
there a way to pinpoint such problems to prevent people from tossing
these into bugzilla?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-02 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-25 3:39 Ho ho ho.. Linux 2.6.15-rc7 Linus Torvalds
2005-12-25 5:00 ` Keith Owens
2005-12-26 5:23 ` Grant Coady
2005-12-26 13:54 ` Kalin KOZHUHAROV
2005-12-28 9:11 ` Paul Rolland
2005-12-26 18:02 ` Mark Knecht
2005-12-26 18:14 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-27 2:49 ` Mark Knecht
2005-12-27 5:56 ` Michael Krufky
2005-12-27 13:23 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2005-12-27 17:53 ` Michael Krufky
2005-12-26 18:50 ` Markus Koßmann
2005-12-26 23:24 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2005-12-27 5:47 ` Michael Krufky
2005-12-27 12:43 ` Pekka Enberg
2005-12-29 13:39 ` [2.6.15-rc7 patch] Reject SRAT tables that don't cover all memory Adrian Bunk
2005-12-29 16:07 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-29 16:20 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-12-29 16:23 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-02 16:46 ` 2.6.15-rc7: known regressions Adrian Bunk
2006-01-02 17:07 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-02 17:23 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-02 17:38 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-02 18:30 ` Ochal Christophe [this message]
2006-01-02 18:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1136226637.7602.9.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ochal@kefren.be \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox