Re: [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency

Andi Kleen
2006-01-07T02:18:06Z

On Saturday 07 January 2006 01:17, David S. Miller wrote:

>
> I mean something like this patch:

Looks like a good idea to me.

I always disliked the per chain spinlocks even for other hash tables like
TCP/UDP multiplex - it would be much nicer to use a much smaller separately
hashed lock table and save cache. In this case the special case of using
a one entry only lock hash table makes sense.

-Andi