From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>,
"Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
hawkes@sgi.com, Tony Luck <tony.luck@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>, Dan Higgins <djh@sgi.com>,
John Hesterberg <jh@sgi.com>, Greg Edwards <edwardsg@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ia64: change defconfig to NR_CPUS==1024
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 20:17:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1136578666.2548.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1136573948.2940.65.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
On Gwe, 2006-01-06 at 19:59 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> things differently; when a config option needs deciding you look at the
> description and pick a good value. That's it. Defconfig doesn't matter.
defconfig is 'Linus config', and he's stated as much before along with
polite hints that this wasn't going to change. The vendor default config
s are actually far saner for most users.
Do vendors look at defconfig - not really, much more interesting is
every other vendors config choices 8)
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-06 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-06 17:45 [PATCH] ia64: change defconfig to NR_CPUS==1024 Luck, Tony
2006-01-06 17:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-01-06 18:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-06 18:07 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-01-06 18:19 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-01-06 18:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-06 18:59 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-06 20:17 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2006-01-06 20:18 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-01-06 20:42 ` Rohit Seth
2006-01-06 21:00 ` Dave Jones
2006-01-06 18:25 ` Adrian Bunk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-06 17:19 Luck, Tony
2006-01-06 17:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-06 17:26 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-01-05 21:39 hawkes
2006-01-05 22:33 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-01-06 17:06 ` John Hawkes
2006-01-06 8:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-12 0:09 ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-12 19:04 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1136578666.2548.1.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=djh@sgi.com \
--cc=edwardsg@sgi.com \
--cc=hawkes@sgi.com \
--cc=jh@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=tony.luck@gmail.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox