From: Rohit Seth <rohit.seth@intel.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>,
"Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
hawkes@sgi.com, Tony Luck <tony.luck@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>, Dan Higgins <djh@sgi.com>,
John Hesterberg <jh@sgi.com>, Greg Edwards <edwardsg@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ia64: change defconfig to NR_CPUS==1024
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 12:42:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1136580145.31992.9.camel@akash.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1136573948.2940.65.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 10:59 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> > Vendors look for the upstream defaults and orient themselves on the
> > defconfig.
>
> they do? That's news to me. I've worked at a vendor for almost 5
> years,
> 3 1/2 years of which I was the person who decided on the configs (with
> external input of course). In those 3 1/2 years I *never* looked at
> defconfig. *never*. And I don't expect other vendor kernel owners to
> do
> things differently; when a config option needs deciding you look at
> the
> description and pick a good value. That's it. Defconfig doesn't
> matter.
>
IMO something like 128 is a good number as a default for most IA-64
machines. As Arjan said above, OSVs almost always have their own
reasons and input to choose this number. And lately there is a trend of
having at least two kernels, one for mostly used platforms and the other
one for bigger configurations.
-rohit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-06 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-06 17:45 [PATCH] ia64: change defconfig to NR_CPUS==1024 Luck, Tony
2006-01-06 17:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-01-06 18:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-06 18:07 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-01-06 18:19 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-01-06 18:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-06 18:59 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-06 20:17 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-06 20:18 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-01-06 20:42 ` Rohit Seth [this message]
2006-01-06 21:00 ` Dave Jones
2006-01-06 18:25 ` Adrian Bunk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-06 17:19 Luck, Tony
2006-01-06 17:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-06 17:26 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-01-05 21:39 hawkes
2006-01-05 22:33 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-01-06 17:06 ` John Hawkes
2006-01-06 8:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-12 0:09 ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-12 19:04 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1136580145.31992.9.camel@akash.sc.intel.com \
--to=rohit.seth@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=djh@sgi.com \
--cc=edwardsg@sgi.com \
--cc=hawkes@sgi.com \
--cc=jh@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=tony.luck@gmail.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox