From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964844AbWAIQVT (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:21:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964848AbWAIQVT (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:21:19 -0500 Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:44515 "HELO mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S964844AbWAIQVS (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:21:18 -0500 Subject: Re: reiserfs mount time From: Lee Revell To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: <1136763077.2997.4.camel@mindpipe> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:21:15 -0500 Message-Id: <1136823676.9957.46.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.5.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 17:18 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >> > >> brought to attentino on an irc channel, reiser seems to have the largest > >> mount times for big partitions. I see this behavior on at least two > >> machines (160G, 250G) and one specially-crafted virtual machine > >> (a 1.9TB disk / 1.9TB partition - took somewhere over 120 seconds). > >> Here's a dig http://linuxgazette.net/122/misc/piszcz/group001/image002.png > >> from http://linuxgazette.net/122/TWDT.html#piszcz > >> So, any hint from the reiserfs developers how come reiserfs takes so long? > >> Standard mkreiserfs options (none extra passed). > > > >reiser3 or reiser4? > > For my case, reiser3. > > (According to that pic link (from irc) also reiser4, but I'm inclined not > to believe that one.) reiser3 is in maintenance mode so is unlikely to be fixed. If you still have the problem with reiser4 then they would probably like to hear about it. Lee