From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964854AbWAKVQk (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:16:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964855AbWAKVQk (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:16:40 -0500 Received: from 213-239-205-147.clients.your-server.de ([213.239.205.147]:65255 "EHLO mail.tglx.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964854AbWAKVQj (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:16:39 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.6.15-rt4-sr1 From: Thomas Gleixner Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Ingo Molnar , George Anzinger , john stultz , LKML In-Reply-To: <1137012431.6197.117.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1137012431.6197.117.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:16:38 +0100 Message-Id: <1137014199.7593.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 15:47 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > - posix_timers deadlock - There's a loop in the posix_timeres code that > is entered if the current process is a higher priority than the > softirqd thread, and it spins until the softirqd thread is finished. > But since the thread is of a higher priority than the softirqd, it > deadlocks. Good catch, thanks tglx