From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: thockin@hockin.org
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:09:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1137175792.15108.26.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060113181631.GA15366@hockin.org>
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 10:16 -0800, thockin@hockin.org wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 12:58:36PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > If your BIOS has an ACPI "HPET" table, then the kernel can use the HPET
> > > timer instead. It doesn't solve the problem for apps or other kernel bits
> > > that use rdtsc directly, but there are other fixes for that floating
> > > around which will hopefully get consideration when they're mature.
> >
> > The apps can be converted to use clock_gettime(), but that does not help
> > if the kernel can't keep reasonable time on these machines.
>
> Some apps/users need higher resolution and lower overhead that only rdtsc
> can offer currently.
>
But obviously if the TSC gives wildly inaccurate results, it cannot be
used no matter how low the overhead.
> > But if we just use "clock=pmtmr" by default on these machines the TSC is
> > not a problem right?
>
> I never tried it with pmtimer, we had HPET available. Empirically TSC did
> not work (and we had a simple test case to show how bad it could get).
> HPET made that go away for users of gettimeofday().
>
> We're exploring rdtsc-compatible solutions.
>
Since timekeeping on these machines has always been completely broken,
shouldn't the default time source have been changed to the PM timer or
HPET as soon as the problem was known?
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-13 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-12 22:17 Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs Lee Revell
2006-01-13 15:10 ` Roger Heflin
2006-01-13 16:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-13 17:47 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-13 17:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-13 17:54 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-13 18:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-13 18:55 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-13 20:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-13 20:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-13 20:40 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-13 20:43 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-13 20:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-01-13 20:48 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-13 20:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-01-13 20:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-13 21:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-13 21:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-01-13 21:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-16 9:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-01-16 15:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-14 0:23 ` john stultz
2006-01-14 1:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-14 1:14 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-14 1:23 ` john stultz
2006-01-14 1:27 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-14 1:39 ` john stultz
2006-01-14 1:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-14 1:50 ` john stultz
2006-01-14 2:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-14 2:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-16 1:19 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-14 6:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-13 18:06 ` thockin
2006-01-13 17:58 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-13 18:16 ` thockin
2006-01-13 18:09 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2006-01-13 18:55 ` thockin
2006-01-13 18:56 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2006-01-13 19:00 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-13 19:07 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2006-01-13 21:18 ` David Lang
2006-01-13 21:56 ` thockin
2006-01-13 22:05 ` David Lang
2006-01-13 22:18 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2006-01-13 22:49 ` David Lang
2006-01-14 0:41 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2006-01-14 1:04 ` David Lang
2006-01-14 1:21 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2006-01-14 1:51 ` thockin
2006-01-15 8:52 ` Zan Lynx
2006-01-15 16:25 ` thockin
2006-01-15 16:33 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-15 18:21 ` thockin
2006-01-15 18:29 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-15 18:49 ` thockin
2006-01-14 1:13 ` thockin
2006-01-13 22:23 ` thockin
2006-01-13 19:13 ` Xavier Bestel
2006-01-13 19:32 ` thockin
2006-01-13 20:58 ` Steven Rostedt
[not found] <5ujmj-1UQ-511@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5uBnF-2SG-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5uBnF-2SG-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5uBxi-3iM-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5uBGY-3ul-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5uCa5-443-45@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5uCjF-4fW-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5uCtj-4Fi-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-01-14 0:24 ` Robert Hancock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1137175792.15108.26.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thockin@hockin.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox