Re: So - What's going on with Reiser 4?

[Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>]

On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 10:11 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
> 
> Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Sad, 2006-01-14 at 20:34 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
> >   
> >>>> I am not going to search the archives before asking a question.
> >>>>         
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >> I just asked a question. Obviously it's a question that seems to 
> >> politically hot to handle. I didn't realize reiser 4 was a prohibited 
> >> subject.
> >>     
> >
> > Its not. Possibly your behaviour should come under "prohibited attitude"
> > but we don't have thought crime on the list beyond that your government
> > may be seeking to impose.
> >
> > Its an "oh god not again" subject that has been beaten to death
> > repeatedly, and that is why people asked you to look at the archive
> > instead of wasting everyones time.
> >
> > If you are really keen to get resierfs4 into the base kernel why not
> > email the reiserfs4 people and ask to help clean up the code and test
> > it ?
> >
> > Alan
> >   
> Look - all I did was ask a simple question about what was the status of 
> Reiser 4 and everyone is freaking out that I asked the question. You 
> guys are acting like you are members of a cult or something. I'm not 
> advocating anything. I just asked a question.
> 

No one freaked out, we just said "we have no idea, ask the reiser4
developers".

Lee