public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: kkeil@suse.de, kai.germaschewski@gmx.de,
	isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] ISDN_CAPI_CAPIFS related cleanups
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:57:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1138924621.3788.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060202214059.GB14097@stusta.de>

Hi Adrian,

> > > This patch contains the following cleanups:
> > > - move the help text to the right option
> > > - replace some #ifdef's in capi.c with dummy functions in capifs.h
> > > - use CONFIG_ISDN_CAPI_CAPIFS_BOOL in one place in capi.c
> > 
> > I actually still like to see capifs removed completely. It is not really
> > needed if you gonna use udev. The only thing that it is doing, is to set
> > the correct permissions and make sure that the device nodes are created.
> > And with a 2.6 kernel this can be all done by udev.
> 
> udev is not mandatory.
> 
> Static /dev is still 100% supported and working fine.

and if you have static /dev then you can use mknod and chown by
yourself. If you use CAPI on any newer distribution with the latest 2.6
kernel you will have udev anyway and so no static /dev at all.

Regards

Marcel



  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-02 23:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-31 21:33 [2.6 patch] ISDN_CAPI_CAPIFS related cleanups Adrian Bunk
2006-01-31 21:44 ` Marcel Holtmann
2006-02-02 21:40   ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-02 23:57     ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2006-02-03  8:45       ` Armin Schindler
2006-02-03  8:53         ` Marcel Holtmann
2006-02-03 10:18           ` Armin Schindler
2006-02-03 19:57             ` Marcel Holtmann
2006-02-12 11:09               ` Carsten Paeth
2006-02-12 11:36                 ` Marcel Holtmann
2006-02-18 15:46                   ` Carsten Paeth
2006-02-01  8:43 ` Armin Schindler
2006-02-01 10:44   ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-01 11:01     ` Armin Schindler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1138924621.3788.2.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de \
    --cc=kai.germaschewski@gmx.de \
    --cc=kkeil@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox