From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965020AbWBGM3Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 07:29:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965045AbWBGM3Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 07:29:16 -0500 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:57257 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965020AbWBGM3P (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 07:29:15 -0500 Subject: Re: Broken NFS (perhaps Cache invalidation bug ?) From: Alan Cox To: "L. D. Marks" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 12:31:22 +0000 Message-Id: <1139315482.18391.28.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Llu, 2006-02-06 at 20:52 -0600, L. D. Marks wrote: > I should have added the kernel: 2.6.9-22.0.2.ELsmp #1 SMP with > nfs-utils-1.0.6-65.EL4 Vendor kernels diverge quite a bit from the base tree (because they freeze a kernel and backport the critical fixes from thereon). So really you are best advised to ask your vendor (Red Hat or Centos or whoever) rather than ask here for that kernel. Alan