From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
"Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>,
Keith Owens <kaos@sgi.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [2.6 patch] let IA64_GENERIC select more stuff
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 12:21:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1139426479.26420.189.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B8E391BBE9FE384DAA4C5C003888BE6F05A6DEE7@scsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 10:35 -0800, Luck, Tony wrote:
> The current set looks close ... perhaps PCI should be added as it isn't
> likely to inconvenience anyone, but SMP is a lot further into murky territory
Seems like maybe PCI was removed so that it was possible to configure
a generic kernel to boot on the simulator... I could imagine not having
PCI might have some degree of usefulness when using a ramdisk. Isn't
this what the defconfigs are for?
Alex
--
Alex Williamson HP Linux & Open Source Lab
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-08 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-08 18:35 [2.6 patch] let IA64_GENERIC select more stuff Luck, Tony
2006-02-08 19:21 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2006-02-08 19:24 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-02-08 19:55 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-02-08 21:24 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-02-08 21:36 ` Chen, Kenneth W
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-08 22:35 Luck, Tony
2006-02-08 19:48 Luck, Tony
2006-02-07 22:11 [2.6 patch] IA64_GENERIC shouldn't select other stuff Adrian Bunk
2006-02-07 22:37 ` Keith Owens
2006-02-07 23:17 ` [2.6 patch] let IA64_GENERIC select more stuff Adrian Bunk
2006-02-08 0:52 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-02-08 1:19 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-08 1:40 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-02-08 2:08 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-08 2:17 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-02-08 2:43 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-08 2:48 ` Keith Owens
2006-02-08 2:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-02-08 2:58 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-02-08 3:51 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-08 5:52 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-02-08 11:59 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-08 13:38 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-02-08 21:38 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-08 22:24 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-02-08 22:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-09 12:53 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-02-09 13:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-02-09 13:26 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-02-09 14:16 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-09 15:19 ` Jes Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1139426479.26420.189.camel@localhost \
--to=alex.williamson@hp.com \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=jes@sgi.com \
--cc=kaos@sgi.com \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox