From: MIke Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>,
gcoady@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 06:32:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1139808766.7642.12.camel@homer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200602131605.17198.kernel@kolivas.org>
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 16:05 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Monday 13 February 2006 15:59, MIke Galbraith wrote:
> > Now, let's see if we can get your problem fixed with something that can
> > possibly go into 2.6.16 as a bugfix. Can you please try the below?
>
> These sorts of changes definitely need to pass through -mm first... and don't
> forget -mm looks quite different to mainline.
I'll leave that up to Ingo of course, and certainly have no problem with
them burning in mm. However, I must say that I personally classify
these two changes as being trivial and obviously correct enough to be
included in 2.6.16. I realize that mm is different in this area (we
talked about it), but the problems addressed by this patch still remain.
Anyway, let's wait and see if it fixes Lee's problem.
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-13 5:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-08 2:11 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown Grant Coady
2006-02-08 2:24 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-02-08 2:50 ` Grant Coady
2006-02-08 3:02 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-02-08 2:35 ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-08 2:55 ` Grant Coady
2006-02-08 3:00 ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-08 4:12 ` Barry K. Nathan
2006-02-08 4:41 ` Grant Coady
2006-02-08 4:51 ` Grant Coady
2006-02-08 5:17 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-02-08 5:39 ` Grant Coady
2006-02-08 7:43 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-09 17:06 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-02-09 20:06 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-10 6:35 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-12 13:47 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-12 19:03 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-12 21:36 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-12 23:23 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-12 23:39 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-13 3:09 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-13 3:39 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-13 4:59 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-13 5:05 ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-13 5:32 ` MIke Galbraith [this message]
2006-02-13 5:37 ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-13 5:57 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-13 6:08 ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-13 6:35 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-13 6:38 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-13 7:08 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-13 8:43 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-13 10:06 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-13 12:35 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-15 4:22 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-15 5:22 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-15 6:11 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-15 7:17 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-13 7:15 ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-13 7:41 ` MIke Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1139808766.7642.12.camel@homer \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=gcoady@gmail.com \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox