public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: MIke Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>,
	gcoady@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:11:04 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1139983865.2733.20.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1139980940.24148.47.camel@homer>

On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 06:22 +0100, MIke Galbraith wrote:
> > OK, with 2.6.16-rc2-mm1, "ls" bounces around between 0.15s and
> 0.50s.
> > Better than mainline but the large seemingly random variance is
> still
> > perceptible and annoying.  And, "ls | cat" behaves about the same as
> > "ls", while on mainline it was consistently faster (!).
> 
> Ok.  That means the reduction in fluctuation had nothing to do with my
> changes.  It also suggests that there may be something of a regression
> in the changes that are in mm, which I also carried in my patch, since
> the timing for both kernels appear to be ~identical with or without my
> bits.  That seems a little odd to me considering what those changes
> do.
> 
> > 
> > Do you have an updated patch against -mm that I can test?
> 
> I will soon if you still want to try it. I've fixed the throttle
> release
> thing, and am fine tuning the interactivity bits.  I have it working
> very well now, but want to try to squeeze some more from it.
> 
> Drop me a line if you're still interested from the interactivity side,
> but I think the ls delay reduction has turned out to be a red
> herring. 

Just to be clear - this is 2.6.16-rc2-mm1 *without* your patch that I am
talking about.

Lee


  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-15  6:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-08  2:11 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown Grant Coady
2006-02-08  2:24 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-02-08  2:50   ` Grant Coady
2006-02-08  3:02     ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-02-08  2:35 ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-08  2:55   ` Grant Coady
2006-02-08  3:00     ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-08  4:12       ` Barry K. Nathan
2006-02-08  4:41         ` Grant Coady
2006-02-08  4:51       ` Grant Coady
2006-02-08  5:17         ` Willy Tarreau
2006-02-08  5:39           ` Grant Coady
2006-02-08  7:43       ` Lee Revell
2006-02-09 17:06   ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-02-09 20:06     ` Lee Revell
2006-02-10  6:35       ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-12 13:47         ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-12 19:03           ` Lee Revell
2006-02-12 21:36             ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-12 23:23               ` Lee Revell
2006-02-12 23:39               ` Lee Revell
2006-02-13  3:09                 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-13  3:39                   ` Lee Revell
2006-02-13  4:59                     ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-13  5:05                       ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-13  5:32                         ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-13  5:37                           ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-13  5:57                             ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-13  6:08                               ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-13  6:35                                 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-13  6:38                                   ` Lee Revell
2006-02-13  7:08                                     ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-13  8:43                                       ` Lee Revell
2006-02-13 10:06                                         ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-13 12:35                                         ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-15  4:22                                           ` Lee Revell
2006-02-15  5:22                                             ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-15  6:11                                               ` Lee Revell [this message]
2006-02-15  7:17                                                 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-13  7:15                                   ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-13  7:41                                     ` MIke Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1139983865.2733.20.camel@mindpipe \
    --to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=gcoady@gmail.com \
    --cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox