The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Fulghum <paulkf@microgate.com>
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: make -j with j <= 4 seems to only load a single CPU core
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 15:42:41 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1140558161.9838.8.camel@amdx2.microgate.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a8748490602211310j344db10evd685149a3c60b1e7@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 22:10 +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:

> I should probably mention that the kernel I'm currently running and
> observing this behaviour with is 2.6.16-rc4-mm1.
...
> > I find this quite strange since anything from 'make -j 2' and up
> > should be able to keep both cores resonably busy, but there seems to
> > be a huge difference between j <= 4 and j > 4.

I've seen the same thing (on Athlon 64x2 64 bit)
but was not sure if it was a problem.

The break point for me seems to be between -j 2 and -j 3
-j 2 = serialized (or the appearance of)
-j 3 = both cores mostly busy

I'm pretty sure with an earlier 2.6 kernel source (but same environment)
I did not see this. I'll start back tracking to earlier kernels
to see if I can identify when this started.

-- 
Paul Fulghum
Microgate Systems, Ltd


  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-21 21:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-21 21:02 make -j with j <= 4 seems to only load a single CPU core Jesper Juhl
2006-02-21 21:10 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-21 21:42   ` Paul Fulghum [this message]
2006-02-21 21:47     ` Paul Fulghum
2006-02-21 21:51     ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-21 21:54       ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-02-21 21:59         ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-21 22:02     ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-21 22:15   ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-02-21 22:18     ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-23 19:44 ` Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1140558161.9838.8.camel@amdx2.microgate.com \
    --to=paulkf@microgate.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox