From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Building 100 kernels; we suck at dependencies and drown in warnings
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:50:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1140994219.24141.197.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fym53g5m.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix>
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 22:32 +0000, Nix wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, Al Viro moaned:
> > On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 09:46:32PM +0000, Nix wrote:
> >> (i.e., there's a reason that warning uses the word *might*.)
> >
> > The bug is in spewing tons of false positives, reducing S/N on that
> > warning to nearly useless level. Note that in this case actually
> > missing some would be more useful if what remains is less diluted
> > by crap.
>
> I think this might be <http://gcc.gnu.org/PR5035>.
>
Al posted a quite compelling analysis of this bug a while back that's
much better than anything in that bug report, of course I can't find it
right now.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-26 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-26 16:21 Building 100 kernels; we suck at dependencies and drown in warnings Jesper Juhl
2006-02-26 16:31 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-26 16:35 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-26 19:31 ` Dave Jones
2006-02-26 19:43 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-26 20:11 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-26 23:45 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-02-27 2:02 ` Pavel Machek
2006-02-26 19:30 ` Dave Jones
2006-02-26 17:00 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-26 17:29 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-26 17:41 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-26 18:08 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-26 17:38 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-26 18:21 ` Diego Calleja
2006-02-26 18:45 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-26 19:03 ` Diego Calleja
2006-02-26 20:42 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-26 20:44 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-26 21:46 ` Nix
2006-02-26 21:49 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-26 21:53 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-26 21:56 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-26 22:08 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-26 22:12 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-27 17:25 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-02-26 22:14 ` Al Viro
2006-02-26 22:32 ` Nix
2006-02-26 22:50 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2006-02-26 21:14 ` Grant Coady
2006-02-27 12:56 ` David Greaves
2006-02-28 10:30 ` Roman Zippel
2006-02-26 22:43 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-03-02 20:25 ` Jesper Juhl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1140994219.24141.197.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nix@esperi.org.uk \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox