From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
pwil3058@bigpond.net.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@elte.hu, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, kenneth.w.chen@intel.com,
akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.16-rc5-mm2] sched_cleanup-V17 - task throttling patch 1 of 2
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 08:04:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1141455840.9482.19.camel@homer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603041750.21484.kernel@kolivas.org>
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 17:50 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Saturday 04 March 2006 17:50, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > Well Fudgecicles. Now you guys have gotten me aaaaall confused. Are
> > there cpus out there (in generic linux land) that have 16 bit integers
> > or not? 16 bit integers existing in a 32 bit cpu OS seems like an alien
> > concept to me, but I'm not a twisted cpu designer... I'll just go with
> > the flow ;-)
>
> All supported architectures on linux currently use 32bits for int. That should
> give you 2.1 seconds in nanoseconds. Sorry my legacy of remembering when ints
> were 8 bits coloured me.
Well that's a relief. I was getting all kinds of frazzled trying to
imagine the kernel not exploding on such a cpu.
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-04 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-17 13:45 [patch 2.6.16-rc3-mm1] Task Throttling V9 MIke Galbraith
2006-02-24 20:29 ` [patch 2.6.16-rc4-mm1] Task Throttling V14 MIke Galbraith
2006-02-24 22:15 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-25 1:16 ` Peter Williams
2006-02-25 2:20 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-25 2:42 ` Nick Piggin
2006-02-25 2:57 ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-25 3:08 ` Nick Piggin
2006-02-25 3:35 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-25 2:23 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-03-03 10:43 ` [patch 2.6.16-rc5-mm2] sched_cleanup-V17 - task throttling patch 1 of 2 Mike Galbraith
2006-03-03 10:58 ` [patch 2.6.16-rc5-mm2] sched_throttle-V17 - task throttling patch 2 " Mike Galbraith
2006-03-03 23:58 ` [patch 2.6.16-rc5-mm2] sched_cleanup-V17 - task throttling patch 1 " Peter Williams
2006-03-04 4:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-04 21:37 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-05 4:53 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-05 6:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-04 2:33 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-04 5:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-04 5:24 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-04 5:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-04 5:40 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-03-04 5:54 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-04 6:05 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-03-04 6:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-04 6:50 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-04 7:04 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2006-03-05 22:29 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-04 21:44 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-04 10:53 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-02-26 11:26 ` [patch 2.6.16-rc4-mm1] Task Throttling V14 Daniel K.
2006-02-26 13:19 ` MIke Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1141455840.9482.19.camel@homer \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox