public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <bos@pathscale.com>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
Cc: rolandd@cisco.com, gregkh@suse.de, akpm@osdl.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	openib-general@openib.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7 of 20] ipath - misc driver support code
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:29:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1141946942.10693.36.camel@serpentine.pathscale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adau0a7fbzf.fsf@cisco.com>

On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 15:13 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:

> This is kind of theoritical, but it seems to me that it would be safer
> to write this as
> 
> 	int ipath_unordered_wc(void)
> 	{
> 		return boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD;
> 	}
> 
> after all, Via is probably going to have an x86-64 CPU one of these
> days, and I doubt you've checked that their WC flush is ordered.

It's purely a performance optimisation.  Since we tune very closely to
each CPU, there's no point right now in sort-of-tuning for a CPU that
doesn't yet exist :-)

	<b


  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-09 23:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <2f16f504dd4b98c2ce7c.1141922820@localhost.localdomain>
2006-03-09 23:11 ` [PATCH 7 of 20] ipath - misc driver support code Roland Dreier
2006-03-09 23:27   ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-03-09 23:13 ` Roland Dreier
2006-03-09 23:29   ` Bryan O'Sullivan [this message]
2006-03-09 23:36     ` Roland Dreier
2006-03-10 19:23       ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-03-10  0:35 [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath driver - another round for review Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-03-10  0:35 ` [PATCH 7 of 20] ipath - misc driver support code Bryan O'Sullivan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1141946942.10693.36.camel@serpentine.pathscale.com \
    --to=bos@pathscale.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=openib-general@openib.org \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=rolandd@cisco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox