From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 09:18:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1142324308.8075.9.camel@homer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060314072921.GA13969@elte.hu>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 698 bytes --]
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 08:29 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> and there are some active methods as well: you might want to try Mike
> Galbraith's scheduler throttling feature:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/3/3/59
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/3/3/63
>
> (which we could try in -mm too perhaps, perhaps Mike has an updated
> patch for 2.6.16-rc6-mm1?)
Yeah, the whole thing is in the attached tarball. The only significant
difference from last posted version is that setting both tunables to 0
causes 100% of the interactivity stuff to be disabled, returning the
scheduler to pure O(1), but with it's ability to starve mostly neutered.
-Mike
(delicate tummy warning may be appropriate.. dunno;)
[-- Attachment #2: throttle-V20-2.6.16-rc6-mm1.tar.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-compressed-tar, Size: 7324 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-14 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-13 0:40 Which kernel is the best for a small linux system? j4K3xBl4sT3r
2006-03-13 8:00 ` Lexington Luthor
2006-03-15 1:35 ` Grant Coady
2006-03-15 1:46 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-03-13 8:17 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-13 18:03 ` Grant Coady
2006-03-13 18:06 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-14 6:21 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-03-14 7:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-03-14 8:18 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2006-03-14 9:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-14 15:54 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-03-16 15:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-14 10:03 ` Grant Coady
2006-03-14 22:21 ` Russell King
2006-03-15 0:46 ` Grant Coady
[not found] ` <20060315080313.GC3166@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-03-15 9:37 ` Grant Coady
2006-03-15 22:53 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-03-15 23:32 ` Grant Coady
2006-03-16 4:19 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-16 8:12 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-16 8:31 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-16 8:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-16 9:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-16 2:55 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-03-13 18:27 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-03-13 18:41 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-13 19:01 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-03-14 0:18 ` j4K3xBl4sT3r
2006-03-13 19:08 ` Diego Calleja
2006-03-13 22:00 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2006-03-13 22:01 ` j4K3xBl4sT3r
2006-03-13 22:20 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2006-03-13 22:33 ` j4K3xBl4sT3r
2006-03-16 12:03 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-13 22:25 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-14 3:53 ` Grant Coady
2006-03-15 22:57 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-03-15 23:10 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-03-16 13:39 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1142324308.8075.9.camel@homer \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=willy@w.ods.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox