Re: interactive task starvation

Con Kolivas
2006-03-21T11:54:24Z

On Tuesday 21 March 2006 22:18, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> great work by Mike! One detail: i'd like there to be just one default
> throttling value, i.e. no grace_g tunables [so that we have just one
> default scheduler behavior]. Is the default grace_g[12] setting good
> enough for your workload?

I agree. If anything is required, a simple on/off tunable makes much more
sense. Much like I suggested ages ago with an "interactive" switch which was
rather unpopular when I first suggested it. Perhaps my marketing was wrong.
Oh well.

Cheers,
Con