From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751584AbWC0C0i (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Mar 2006 21:26:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932097AbWC0C0i (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Mar 2006 21:26:38 -0500 Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:10466 "HELO mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751584AbWC0C0h (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Mar 2006 21:26:37 -0500 Subject: Re: [Alsa-devel] nm256: register strangeness related to lockups From: Lee Revell To: Christian Trefzer Cc: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, lkml In-Reply-To: <20060326182607.GB11408@hermes.uziel.local> References: <20060326182607.GB11408@hermes.uziel.local> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 21:26:31 -0500 Message-Id: <1143426392.1792.167.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 20:26 +0200, Christian Trefzer wrote: > Hi folks, > > in the process of analyzing the frequent crashes during the snd-nm256 > module insertion I stumbled across the following register values > (reading 32bit words at a time in a loop with pcitweak): Just to make sure, you are testing with 1.0.11-rc4 or CVS? The nm256 lockup problems were thought to be fixed. Or is this a different bug? Lee