From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751553AbWDAQxq (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Apr 2006 11:53:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751552AbWDAQxq (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Apr 2006 11:53:46 -0500 Received: from viper.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.4]:29894 "HELO viper.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751082AbWDAQxq (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Apr 2006 11:53:46 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.16-mm2 5/9] sched throttle tree extract - correct idle sleep logic From: Lee Revell To: Mike Galbraith Cc: Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , lkml , Peter Williams , Nick Piggin , Con Kolivas In-Reply-To: <1143881983.7617.41.camel@homer> References: <1143880124.7617.5.camel@homer> <1143880397.7617.10.camel@homer> <1143880683.7617.16.camel@homer> <1143881058.7617.24.camel@homer> <1143881494.7617.32.camel@homer> <1143881983.7617.41.camel@homer> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 11:53:35 -0500 Message-Id: <1143910416.2885.17.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2006-04-01 at 10:59 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > This patch corrects the idle sleep logic to place a long sleeping task > into the runqueue at a barely interactive priority such that it can > not destroy interactivity should it immediately begin consuming > massive cpu. Did you test this extensively with bloated apps like Evolution and Firefox that need to be scheduled as interactive tasks even though they often peg the CPU? Lee