From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932173AbWDFTqE (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Apr 2006 15:46:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932179AbWDFTqD (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Apr 2006 15:46:03 -0400 Received: from viper.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.4]:35214 "HELO viper.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932173AbWDFTqC (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Apr 2006 15:46:02 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] coredump: speedup SIGKILL sending From: Lee Revell To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Andrew Morton , "Eric W. Biederman" , Ingo Molnar , "Paul E. McKenney" , Roland McGrath , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060406220628.GA237@oleg> References: <20060406220628.GA237@oleg> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 15:45:58 -0400 Message-Id: <1144352758.2866.105.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 02:06 +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > With this patch a thread group is killed atomically under ->siglock. > This is faster because we can use sigaddset() instead of force_sig_info() > and this is used in further patches. > > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Won't this cause huge latencies when a process with lots of threads is killed? Lee