From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932324AbWDMSiQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:38:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932390AbWDMSiQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:38:16 -0400 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.154]:32418 "EHLO e36.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932324AbWDMSiP (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:38:15 -0400 Subject: Re: notifier chain problem? (was Re: 2.6.17-rc1 did break XFS) From: Chandra Seetharaman Reply-To: sekharan@us.ibm.com To: Herbert Poetzl Cc: Jan Engelhardt , Jes Sorensen , Con Kolivas , Linux Kernel ML , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, Alan Stern , akpm@osdl.org, David Chinner In-Reply-To: <20060413175342.GF6663@MAIL.13thfloor.at> References: <20060413052145.GA31435@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <20060413072325.GF2732@melbourne.sgi.com> <20060413135000.GB6663@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <20060413175342.GF6663@MAIL.13thfloor.at> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: IBM Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 11:38:11 -0700 Message-Id: <1144953491.4762.77.camel@linuxchandra> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 19:53 +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 04:21:18PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > >> > > >> Looks strange, the faulting address is in the same region as the > > >> eip. I am not that strong on x86 layouts, so I am not sure whether > > >> 0x78xxxxxx is the kernel's mapping or it's module space. Almost looks > > >> like something else had registered a notifier and then gone away > > >> without unregistering it. > > > > > >sorry, the essential data I didn't provide here is > > >probably that I configured the 2G/2G split, which for > > >unknown reasons actually is a 2.125/1.875 split and > > >starts at 0x78000000 (instead of 0x80000000) > > > > That's how it is coded in arch/i386/Kconfig. It says 78 rather than 80. > > Maybe Con has an idea? > > here is the same oops with 3/1 split and the bootup log > Hi Herbert, Looks to be the same stack as earlier, Is there any modules compiled in that were removed before you tried to mount the XFS filesystem ? Can you send me the .config file. chandra -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose.... - sekharan@us.ibm.com | .......you may get it. ----------------------------------------------------------------------