From: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, arjan@infradead.org,
greg@kroah.com, hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Makefile: export-symbol usage report generator.
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:25:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1145489158.7323.169.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060418140927.GB11582@stusta.de>
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 16:09 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 05:38:26AM -0700, Ram Pai wrote:
>
> > I ran a report to extract export-symbol usage by kernel modules. The results
> > are at http://www.sudhaa.com/~ram/misc/export_report.txt
> >
> > The report lists:
> > 1. All the exported symbols and their usage counts by in-kernel modules.
> > 2. for each in-kernel module, lists the modules and the exported symbols
> > from those modules, that it depends on.
> >
> > Highlights:
> > On x86 architecture
> > (1) 880 exported symbols not used by any in-kernel modules.
> > (2) 1792 exported symbols used only once.
> >
> > I hope this report/tool shall help all inkernel modules to revisit their usage
> > of kernel interfaces.
> >
> > This patch integrates the report-generator into the kernel build process. After
> > applying this patch, invoke 'make export_report' and it creates the report in
> > Documentation/export_report.txt
> >...
>
> I like your patch, but I have observed two issues:
> - please don't force an allmodconfig, simply use the currently compiled
> kernel
Looking for ideas. Its hard to extract out the imported symbols unless
they are compiled as modules. Running the report on a currently compiled
kernel will miss most of the subsystems that are not compile as modules.
Hence the report wont be complete. Any suggestions?
> - please output to stdout instead of a fixed file
ok.
>
> This way, it would also be consistent with other Makefile targets like
> namespacecheck.
>
> cu
> Adrian
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-19 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-13 12:38 [RFC PATCH 1/2] Makefile: export-symbol usage report generator Ram Pai
2006-04-18 14:09 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-04-19 23:25 ` Ram Pai [this message]
2006-04-19 23:41 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-04-20 0:53 ` Ram Pai
2006-04-20 1:06 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1145489158.7323.169.camel@localhost \
--to=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox