public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Removing .tmp_versions considered harmful
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 07:55:29 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1145620529.20099.18.camel@dv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060421073216.GA17492@mars.ravnborg.org>

Hello, Sam!

On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 09:32 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 12:22:22AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > Hello!
> > 
> > A patch applied shortly after Linux 2.6.16
> > (fb3cbd2e575f9ac0700bfa1e7cb9f4119fbd0abd in git) causes
> > the .tmp_versions directory to be removed every time make is run to
> > build external modules.
> > 
> > 
> > 2) The projects where modules are build in more than one directory (such
> > as MadWifi) are now compiled with spurious warnings about unresolved
> > symbols.  This happens because every module is compiled individually,
> > and the *.mod files for one module are removed before the other is
> > compiled.
> 
> Then fix madwifi so it builds modules as documented in
> Documentation/kbuild/modules.txt
> See: --- 5.3 External modules using several directories

Thanks for showing me this section!  I wish I saw it before I submitted
patches to MadWifi, HostAP and linux-wlan-ng makefiles.  Now I know how
to fix all that mess.

> As with many other external modules madwifi contains a lot of ugly
> makefile hackery - and if done as documentated it gets so much simpler.
> I'm aware that 2-4 support complicates things a little but if people
> made it be slimm and nice for 2.6 and _then_ added 2.4 supporrrrrrrrrrit
> woulllllld be much simpler.
> It seems that people keep all the hackery for 2.4 and does a bad job
> adapting to 2.6.

I agree with your sentiment, and I'm trying to fix it.

However, the problem with "make install" creating .tmp_versions owned by
root still exists.  Can we settle on removing only *.mod files
under .tmp_versions without removing the directory?
Removing .tmp_versions does nothing if the goal is to remove stale *.mod
files.

-- 
Regards,
Pavel Roskin


  reply	other threads:[~2006-04-21 11:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-21  4:22 Removing .tmp_versions considered harmful Pavel Roskin
2006-04-21  7:32 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-04-21 11:55   ` Pavel Roskin [this message]
2006-04-24 19:55   ` Pavel Roskin
2006-04-24 19:58     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-04-24 20:19       ` Pavel Roskin
2006-04-30 21:47     ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-05-01  0:59       ` Pavel Roskin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1145620529.20099.18.camel@dv \
    --to=proski@gnu.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox