public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Cc: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	"Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: kfree(NULL)
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:56:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1145645798.26713.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1145644977.20843.25.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 11:42 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 14:00 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> > [     6491]  c01aafc4 - start_this_handle+0x234/0x4b0
> > [     8404]  c01aba66 - do_get_write_access+0x2e6/0x5a0
> 
> 
> IMO , these two are overloaded with goto's it makes it hard to know
> whats going on .
> 

(I've added Stephen Tweedie to the CC list since these two functions are
his)

Perhaps this patch is something that can be useful. It can tell us where
we need to either fix the logic so that a kfree(NULL) doesn't happen, or
it can tell us where we should have a "if (obj) kfree(obj)" since it is
quicker than doing the function call.

Right now, these two locations seem to be good candidates to putting in
the NULL check before calling kfree.

-- Steve



  reply	other threads:[~2006-04-21 18:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <63XWg-1IL-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <63YfP-26I-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <63ZEY-45n-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-04-21 15:25     ` kfree(NULL) Tilman Schmidt
2006-04-21 16:03       ` kfree(NULL) Daniel Walker
2006-04-21 17:48         ` kfree(NULL) Jörn Engel
2006-04-21 18:00         ` kfree(NULL) Steven Rostedt
2006-04-21 18:42           ` kfree(NULL) Daniel Walker
2006-04-21 18:56             ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2006-04-21 19:26           ` kfree(NULL) Andrew Morton
2006-04-22 12:05 kfree(NULL) linux
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-04-21 21:02 kfree(NULL) Hua Zhong
2006-04-21 21:11 ` kfree(NULL) Daniel Walker
2006-04-21 21:36   ` kfree(NULL) Michael Buesch
2006-04-21 21:42 ` kfree(NULL) Andrew Morton
2006-04-21 21:48   ` kfree(NULL) Andrew Morton
2006-04-21 22:53   ` kfree(NULL) Hua Zhong
2006-04-21 22:58     ` kfree(NULL) Daniel Walker
2006-04-21 23:03       ` kfree(NULL) Hua Zhong
2006-04-21 23:25     ` kfree(NULL) Andrew Morton
2006-04-21 23:27     ` kfree(NULL) Andrew Morton
2006-04-22 11:18   ` kfree(NULL) Jan Engelhardt
2006-04-21  7:03 kfree(NULL) Daniel Walker
2006-04-21  7:22 ` kfree(NULL) James Morris
2006-04-21  8:54   ` kfree(NULL) Andrew Morton
2006-04-21 13:56     ` kfree(NULL) Vernon Mauery
2006-04-21 14:07       ` kfree(NULL) Dmitry Fedorov
2006-04-21 15:07         ` kfree(NULL) Jan Engelhardt
2006-04-21 19:22           ` kfree(NULL) Adrian Bunk
2006-04-21 20:30             ` kfree(NULL) Vernon Mauery
2006-04-21 20:54               ` kfree(NULL) Steven Rostedt
2006-04-21 21:38               ` kfree(NULL) Adrian Bunk
2006-04-22 11:56               ` kfree(NULL) Jörn Engel
2006-04-21 23:55     ` kfree(NULL) Paul Mackerras
2006-04-22  7:43       ` kfree(NULL) Pekka Enberg
2006-04-22  8:48         ` kfree(NULL) Paul Mackerras
2006-04-22 15:02           ` kfree(NULL) Pekka Enberg
2006-04-22 18:57           ` kfree(NULL) Hua Zhong
2006-04-22 19:05             ` kfree(NULL) Nick Piggin
2006-04-22 19:22               ` kfree(NULL) Hua Zhong
2006-04-22 19:25                 ` kfree(NULL) Nick Piggin
2006-04-22 20:18                   ` kfree(NULL) Jan Engelhardt
2006-04-23 16:50               ` kfree(NULL) Steven Rostedt
2006-04-22 11:34       ` kfree(NULL) Jesper Juhl
2006-04-21 14:06   ` kfree(NULL) Daniel Walker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1145645798.26713.6.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sct@redhat.com \
    --cc=tilman@imap.cc \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox