Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul

[Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>]

On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 22:07 +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
> Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 07:49 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 19:24 -0700, sekharan@us.ibm.com wrote:
> > > > CKRM has gone through a major overhaul by removing some of the
> > > > complexity, cutting down on features and moving portions to userspace.
> > >
> > > What do you want done with these patches?  Do you think they are ready
> > > for mainline?  -mm?  Or, are you just posting here for comments?
> >
> > We think it is ready for -mm. But, want to go through a review cycle in
> > lkml before i request Andrew for that.
> 
> IMHO, it would be a good idea to decouple the current implementation and 
> reconnect them via an open mapper/wrapper to allow a more flexible/open 

I am not understanding your comment, can you please elaborate.

> approach to resource management, which may ease its transition into 
> mainline, due to a step-by-step instead of an all-or-none approach.

BTW, the design does allow step by step approach to resource management.
You can add individual resource control one at a time, or even turn on
only the resources you are interested in.

> 
> Thanks!
> 
> --
> Al
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 
-- 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Chandra Seetharaman               | Be careful what you choose....
              - sekharan@us.ibm.com   |      .......you may get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------