From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932149AbWDYJAq (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2006 05:00:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932152AbWDYJAq (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2006 05:00:46 -0400 Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1]:45547 "EHLO mail.cs.helsinki.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932149AbWDYJAp (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2006 05:00:45 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] s390: Hypervisor File System From: Pekka Enberg To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel" Cc: Michael Holzheu , ioe-lkml@rameria.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mschwid2@de.ibm.com In-Reply-To: <20060425085230.GA23127@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> References: <20060424191941.7aa6412a.holzheu@de.ibm.com> <1145948304.11463.5.camel@localhost> <1145950336.11463.8.camel@localhost> <20060425085230.GA23127@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:00:42 +0300 Message-Id: <1145955643.27659.12.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 25 April 2006 10:32:16 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > Hmm, thinking about this, I think a better API would be to not have that > > reject parameter at all. Would something like this be accetable for your > > use? On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 10:52 +0200, Jörn Engel wrote: > [...] > > > + while (*s && isspace(*s)) > > + s++; > > Just checking. This does remove a newline, right? Yes, it does. Pekka