From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965159AbWD1FM7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:12:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965177AbWD1FM7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:12:59 -0400 Received: from ms-smtp-02.southeast.rr.com ([24.25.9.101]:27077 "EHLO ms-smtp-02.southeast.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965159AbWD1FM7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:12:59 -0400 Subject: Re: s390 lcs incorrect test From: Greg Smith To: Frank Pavlic Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mschwid2@de.ibm.com In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 01:12:52 -0400 Message-Id: <1146201172.3064.41.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 (2.6.1-1.fc5.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I have discovered today our bug regarding lcs emulation and everything seems to work fine even with the incorrect test. Which leads me to think that the lcs code has been crafted to withstand the incorrect test. Meaning that correcting the test may have implications. Greg Smith On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 06:34 +0200, Frank Pavlic wrote: > I agree , it's really weird ... > > Thank you Greg for the patch ...