From: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, torvalds@osdl.org
Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
herbert@13thfloor.at, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.17-rc2 - notifier chain problem?
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:12:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1146265920.7063.133.camel@linuxchandra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060426132644.A31761@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 13:26 -0700, Ashok Raj wrote:
Hi All,
Looks like the patches I provided is a step backward from where Ashok &
Andrew were taking the register_cpu_notifier stuff to.
After some discussions with Ashok we both think the following would be
the right direction:
1 revert the changes i pushed recently
2 make all usages of register_cpu_notifier to be _init and
__initdata (if hotplug cpu is defined these are removed)
3 export the symbols register_cpu_notifier and
unregister_cpu_notifier only in CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU is defined
4 move the hot plug cpu based usages of register_cpu_notifier
inside #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUF_CPU(like xfs's usage).
I have few questions:
- any problems with the above direction (mainly 3) ?
- Should we proceed in this direction ?
- is it too late for 2.6.17 ? if not late how much time do we have ?
Many thanks to Alan for bringing up the issue.
regards,
chandra
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 01:21:33PM -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> > >
> > > The problem we ran into was some of the startup code depends on the notifier
> > > call chain for smp bringup, hence we couldn't nuke it similar to
> > > hotcpu_notifier().
> >
> > I do not understand the problem. If everybody that uses
> > register_cpu_notifier() starts using __cpuinit and __cpuinitdata (or the
> > devinit siblings), then the notifier mechanism will not be any different
> > than what they are now, right ? (both in hotplug cpu and non-hotplug cpu
> > case) Or am i missing something ?
>
> Well, register_cpu_notifier() is an exported function. There are several
> modules that use this today like cpufreq etc which disqualifies it to be
> a init style function.
>
> either that function should be devinit and be present premanently, or
> should be mapped to null macro for correctness.
>
> Otherwise module loaders will start to oops when they call into
> register.
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose....
- sekharan@us.ibm.com | .......you may get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-28 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-19 3:27 Linux 2.6.17-rc2 Linus Torvalds
2006-04-19 7:30 ` [patch, 2.6.17-rc2] dm: fix typo Ingo Molnar
2006-04-19 7:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-04-19 18:00 ` Linux 2.6.17-rc2 Diego Calleja
2006-04-19 18:04 ` Hua Zhong
2006-04-19 19:40 ` splice and tee [was Linux 2.6.17-rc2] Jonathan Corbet
2006-04-19 18:44 ` Linux 2.6.17-rc2 Linus Torvalds
2006-04-19 19:20 ` Grzegorz Kulewski
2006-04-19 20:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-19 21:23 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-04-19 21:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-19 22:19 ` Peter Naulls
2006-04-20 13:21 ` Diego Calleja
2006-04-20 14:50 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-20 15:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-20 19:19 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-20 18:40 ` Linh Dang
2006-04-20 19:49 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-20 19:57 ` Linh Dang
2006-04-20 20:02 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-21 7:53 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-20 20:08 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-20 19:26 ` David S. Miller
2006-04-20 19:34 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-20 19:39 ` David S. Miller
2006-04-20 19:44 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-20 19:54 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-20 21:37 ` Piet Delaney
2006-04-20 22:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-20 23:39 ` Piet Delaney
2006-04-21 0:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-20 23:26 ` David Lang
2006-04-21 0:49 ` David S. Miller
2006-04-22 4:52 ` Troy Benjegerdes
2006-04-21 0:41 ` David S. Miller
2006-04-21 17:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-21 18:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-21 18:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-21 0:20 ` David S. Miller
2006-04-21 2:05 ` Andi Kleen
2006-04-21 6:47 ` Piet Delaney
2006-04-20 16:24 ` Ingo Oeser
2006-04-20 19:52 ` splice(), vmsplice() niftiness [was: Re: Linux 2.6.17-rc2] bjd
2006-04-21 10:21 ` Linux 2.6.17-rc2 Alistair John Strachan
2006-04-21 16:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-21 17:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2006-04-21 22:02 ` Andi Kleen
2006-04-22 0:53 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-04-22 1:07 ` Andi Kleen
2006-04-22 13:21 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-04-21 11:01 ` Linux 2.6.17-rc2 - notifier chain problem? Herbert Poetzl
2006-04-21 21:31 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-04-22 0:58 ` Herbert Poetzl
2006-04-24 21:26 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-04-24 22:03 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-24 23:01 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-04-24 23:28 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-25 0:19 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-04-26 15:49 ` Alan Stern
2006-04-26 18:18 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-04-26 18:43 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-26 19:29 ` Ashok Raj
2006-04-26 20:21 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-04-26 20:26 ` Ashok Raj
2006-04-28 23:12 ` Chandra Seetharaman [this message]
2006-04-28 23:23 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-28 23:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-28 23:48 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-04-28 23:43 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-04-29 15:30 ` Alan Stern
2006-04-22 6:40 ` Keith Owens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1146265920.7063.133.camel@linuxchandra \
--to=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=herbert@13thfloor.at \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox