From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932101AbWELPb4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 May 2006 11:31:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932140AbWELPb4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 May 2006 11:31:56 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:43977 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932141AbWELPbz (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 May 2006 11:31:55 -0400 X-Authenticated: #14349625 Subject: Re: swapping and oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x201d2, order=0 From: Mike Galbraith To: Al Boldi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200605121517.59988.a1426z@gawab.com> References: <200605111514.45503.a1426z@gawab.com> <1147412910.8432.14.camel@homer> <200605121517.59988.a1426z@gawab.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 17:31:53 +0200 Message-Id: <1147447913.7520.6.camel@homer> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 15:17 +0300, Al Boldi wrote: > Note that this is not specific to mem=8M, but rather a general oom > observation even for mem=4G, where it is only much later to occur. An oom situation with 4G ram would be more interesting than this one. -Mike