public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -rt] irqd starvation on SMP by a single process?
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:47:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1147456061.9343.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060512055025.GA25824@elte.hu>

On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 07:50 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > +		if(!cpus_equal(current->cpus_allowed, irq_affinity[irq]));
> > +			set_cpus_allowed(current, irq_affinity[irq]);
> 
> > The patch below appears to correct this issue, however it also
> > repeatedly(on different irqs) causes the following BUG:
> 
> ah. This actually uncovered a real bug. We were calling __do_softirq() 
> with interrupts enabled (and being preemptible) - which is certainly 
> bad.
> 
> this was hidden before because the smp_processor_id() debugging code 
> handles tasks bound to a single CPU as per-cpu-safe.
> 
> could you check the (totally untested) patch below and see if that fixes 
> things for you? I've also added your affinity change.

Yep, no BUG messages and I get irq affinity behavior that matches what I
echo into the proc interface.

Looks good to me so far. I'll keep running w/ it and let you know if we
see any issues.

thanks
-john


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-05-12 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-12  2:43 [RFC][PATCH -rt] irqd starvation on SMP by a single process? john stultz
2006-05-12  5:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-12  7:59   ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-12  8:10     ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-12 11:39     ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 11:56       ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-12 11:59         ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 12:53         ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 13:03           ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-12 13:06             ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 13:19             ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 17:47   ` john stultz [this message]
2006-05-12 18:04   ` john stultz
2006-05-12 19:16     ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 20:04     ` Mark Hounschell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-12  4:22 Edward Killips

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1147456061.9343.12.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox