public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -rt] irqd starvation on SMP by a single process?
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:04:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1147457058.9343.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060512055025.GA25824@elte.hu>

On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 07:50 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> +		if (!cpus_equal(current->cpus_allowed, irq_affinity[irq]));
> +			set_cpus_allowed(current, irq_affinity[irq]);

Gah! I introduced a terrible bug there. 

Note the semi-colon at the end of the if statement! Sorry about that!

The following patch (which I've tested as well) fixes that.

--- 2.6-rt/kernel/irq/manage.c	2006-05-11 18:37:36.000000000 -0500
+++ dev-rt/kernel/irq/manage.c	2006-05-12 12:55:56.000000000 -0500
@@ -724,6 +724,7 @@
 		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 		do_hardirq(desc);
 		cond_resched_all();
+		local_irq_disable();
 		__do_softirq();
 //		do_softirq_from_hardirq();
 		local_irq_enable();
@@ -731,10 +732,8 @@
 		/*
 		 * Did IRQ affinities change?
 		 */
-		if (!cpu_isset(smp_processor_id(), irq_affinity[irq])) {
-			mask = cpumask_of_cpu(any_online_cpu(irq_affinity[irq]));
-			set_cpus_allowed(current, mask);
-		}
+		if(!cpus_equal(current->cpus_allowed, irq_affinity[irq]))
+			set_cpus_allowed(current, irq_affinity[irq]);
 #endif
 		schedule();
 	}





  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-05-12 18:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-12  2:43 [RFC][PATCH -rt] irqd starvation on SMP by a single process? john stultz
2006-05-12  5:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-12  7:59   ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-12  8:10     ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-12 11:39     ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 11:56       ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-12 11:59         ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 12:53         ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 13:03           ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-12 13:06             ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 13:19             ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 17:47   ` john stultz
2006-05-12 18:04   ` john stultz [this message]
2006-05-12 19:16     ` Mark Hounschell
2006-05-12 20:04     ` Mark Hounschell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-12  4:22 Edward Killips

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1147457058.9343.22.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox