From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
len.brown@intel.com, gregkh@suse.de,
joachim deguara <joachim.deguara@amd.com>
Subject: Re: Recent x86-64 patch causes many devices to disappear
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:34:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1148654080.16187.107.camel@queen.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4476E1B3.8020605@garzik.org>
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 07:08 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Friday 26 May 2006 12:29, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >> Andi Kleen wrote:
> >>> The problem is that most people cannot figure out how
> >>> to disable this in the BIOS so we needed a way to make it boot
> >>> out of the box.
> >> Agreed.
> >
> > Do you use SCSI on your box? According to Joachim booting with
> > segmentation on and not pci=noacpi SCSI is not seen. And that's the
> > default setup on the machine which made it unusable.
>
> Here, I see:
>
> segmentation on + pci=noacpi == no SCSI
> and additionally
> segmentation on + pci=noacpi == no sata_mv
> and thus overall
> segmentation on + pci=noacpi == no PCI-X bus
>
> (as the posted output on gtf.org shows)
Here are the results from Joachim (without the patch):
(from novell.bugzilla.com bug #82986):
segmentation enablee with no extra kernel params = not working
segmentation enabled with pci=noacpi = working
segmentation disabled with no extra kernel params = working
segmentation disabled with pci=noacpi = working
I'd say that only disabling when segmentation is enabled makes sense...,
however the devices should still appear.
I know there are a lot BIOS versions of this machines flying around.
Maybe everybody should check that the latest version is running, first?
I have:
BIOS Information
Vendor: Hewlett-Packard
Version: 786B9 v2.05
Release Date: 01/26/2006
Thomas
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-26 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-26 9:53 Recent x86-64 patch causes many devices to disappear Jeff Garzik
2006-05-26 10:03 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-26 10:23 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-26 10:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-26 10:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-26 10:55 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-26 11:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-26 14:34 ` Thomas Renninger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1148654080.16187.107.camel@queen.suse.de \
--to=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=joachim.deguara@amd.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox