From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751077AbWFEMuA (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:50:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751078AbWFEMuA (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:50:00 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:14763 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751077AbWFEMt7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:49:59 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch, -rc5-mm3] fix irqpoll some more From: Alan Cox To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Andrew Morton , arjan@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060605084938.GA31915@elte.hu> References: <200606050600.k5560GdU002338@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <1149497459.23209.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060605084938.GA31915@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 14:05:08 +0100 Message-Id: <1149512708.30554.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 (2.6.1-1.fc5.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Unfortunately we've got a load of handlers that just blindly say "Yes I handled something" so they bogusly cause completion to be assumed. We'd actually have to know if the IRQ source had "gone away" on the chip I fear.