From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750875AbWFFAcI (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 20:32:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750949AbWFFAcI (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 20:32:08 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:28897 "EHLO gate.crashing.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750875AbWFFAcG (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 20:32:06 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] PCI power management updates From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Adam Belay Cc: Greg KH , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz In-Reply-To: <1149497136.7831.154.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1149497136.7831.154.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:31:33 +1000 Message-Id: <1149553894.559.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 04:45 -0400, Adam Belay wrote: > Hi All, > > This series of patches is my first pass in an effort to improve PCI > power management. They are against 2.6.17-rc5. The changes include > various PCI PM improvements and fixes, with a focus on low-level > infrastructure. All code has been tested on a limited set of hardware, > and seems to work well, but additional testing coverage will likely be > necessary. I look forward to any suggestions or comments. Looks really good overall, a few comments coming. Ben.