From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932140AbWFFJuH (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 05:50:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932145AbWFFJuG (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 05:50:06 -0400 Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:30091 "EHLO out3.smtp.messagingengine.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932140AbWFFJuF (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 05:50:05 -0400 Message-Id: <1149587406.28634.263152113@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: IE4RAyXnCQs/IbUaCYl0tQQDz2eKwm3JCtfmQFXTO02e 1149587406 From: "Ivan Novick" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME::Lite 5022 (F2.72; T1.15; A1.62; B3.04; Q3.03) Subject: #define pci_module_init pci_register_driver Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:50:06 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, It seems an effort was made to replace all pci_module_init calls with pci_register_driver but in -mm it still seems to have pci_module_init for many drivers. Does anyone know if this is still in the queue somewhere or if it was cancelled? Is pci_register_driver the preferred call to make? Thanks for any info, Ivan