From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750735AbWFKRyx (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jun 2006 13:54:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750741AbWFKRyx (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jun 2006 13:54:53 -0400 Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:17571 "HELO mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750735AbWFKRyw (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jun 2006 13:54:52 -0400 Subject: Re: VGER does gradual SPF activation (FAQ matter) From: Lee Revell To: Folkert van Heusden Cc: Matti Aarnio , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060611160243.GH20700@vanheusden.com> References: <20060610222734.GZ27502@mea-ext.zmailer.org> <20060611160243.GH20700@vanheusden.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 13:54:57 -0400 Message-Id: <1150048497.14253.140.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 18:02 +0200, Folkert van Heusden wrote: > Hmmm. > What about using spamhaus.org sbl+xbl list? > I used to receive 1200 spam messages a day, with spamhaus only half of > that. What about doing nothing? The percentage of spam on LKML is vanishingly small. Lee