public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>,
	LSE-Tech <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Chandra S Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	John T Kohl <jtk@us.ibm.com>, Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>,
	Shailabh Nagar <nagar@watson.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 11/11] Task watchers:  Register per-task semundo watcher
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:55:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1150242906.21787.151.camel@stark> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20060613235122.130021000@localhost.localdomain

This patch switches semundo from using the global task_watchers notifier chain
to a per-task notifier chain. In the case where a task does not use SysV
semaphores this would save a call to exit_sem().

Based off Jes Sorensen's patch implementing this with task_notifiers.

Signed-off-by: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>
--

 ipc/sem.c |   23 ++++++++++++++++-------
 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.17-rc6-mm2/ipc/sem.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.17-rc6-mm2.orig/ipc/sem.c
+++ linux-2.6.17-rc6-mm2/ipc/sem.c
@@ -139,14 +139,10 @@ static int sem_undo_task_exit(struct not
 	default: /* Don't care */
 		return NOTIFY_DONE;
 	}
 }
 
-static struct notifier_block sem_watch_tasks_nb = {
-	.notifier_call = sem_undo_task_exit
-};
-
 static void __ipc_init __sem_init_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns, struct ipc_ids *ids)
 {
 	ns->ids[IPC_SEM_IDS] = ids;
 	ns->sc_semmsl = SEMMSL;
 	ns->sc_semmns = SEMMNS;
@@ -193,11 +189,10 @@ void __init sem_init (void)
 {
 	__sem_init_ns(&init_ipc_ns, &init_sem_ids);
 	ipc_init_proc_interface("sysvipc/sem",
 				"       key      semid perms      nsems   uid   gid  cuid  cgid      otime      ctime\n",
 				IPC_SEM_IDS, sysvipc_sem_proc_show);
-	register_task_watcher(&sem_watch_tasks_nb);
 }
 
 /*
  * Lockless wakeup algorithm:
  * Without the check/retry algorithm a lockless wakeup is possible:
@@ -1010,11 +1005,10 @@ static inline void unlock_semundo(void)
 	undo_list = current->sysvsem.undo_list;
 	if (undo_list)
 		spin_unlock(&undo_list->lock);
 }
 
-
 /* If the task doesn't already have a undo_list, then allocate one
  * here.  We guarantee there is only one thread using this undo list,
  * and current is THE ONE
  *
  * If this allocation and assignment succeeds, but later
@@ -1026,24 +1020,39 @@ static inline void unlock_semundo(void)
  */
 static inline int get_undo_list(struct sem_undo_list **undo_listp)
 {
 	struct sem_undo_list *undo_list;
 	int size;
+	struct notifier_block *semun_nb;
+	int retval;
 
 	undo_list = current->sysvsem.undo_list;
 	if (!undo_list) {
+		semun_nb = NULL;
+		retval = -ENOMEM;
 		size = sizeof(struct sem_undo_list);
 		undo_list = (struct sem_undo_list *) kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (undo_list == NULL)
-			return -ENOMEM;
+			goto err;
+		semun_nb = kzalloc(sizeof(*semun_nb), GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (semun_nb == NULL)
+			goto err;
+		semun_nb->notifier_call = sem_undo_task_exit;
+		retval = register_per_task_watcher(semun_nb);
+		if (retval)
+			goto err;
 		memset(undo_list, 0, size);
 		spin_lock_init(&undo_list->lock);
 		atomic_set(&undo_list->refcnt, 1);
 		current->sysvsem.undo_list = undo_list;
 	}
 	*undo_listp = undo_list;
 	return 0;
+err:
+	kfree(semun_nb);
+	kfree(undo_list);
+	return retval;
 }
 
 static struct sem_undo *lookup_undo(struct sem_undo_list *ulp, int semid)
 {
 	struct sem_undo **last, *un;

--


      parent reply	other threads:[~2006-06-14  0:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20060613235122.130021000@localhost.localdomain>
2006-06-13 23:53 ` [PATCH 01/11] Task watchers: Task Watchers Matt Helsley
2006-06-14  0:19   ` Chase Venters
2006-06-14  0:55     ` Matt Helsley
2006-06-13 23:54 ` [PATCH 02/11] Task watchers: Register process events task watcher Matt Helsley
2006-06-14  0:39   ` Chase Venters
2006-06-14  0:52     ` Matt Helsley
2006-06-13 23:54 ` [PATCH 03/11] Task watchers: Refactor process events Matt Helsley
2006-06-14  0:43   ` Chase Venters
2006-06-14  1:11     ` Matt Helsley
2006-06-14  8:09       ` Chase Venters
2006-06-13 23:54 ` [PATCH 04/11] Task watchers: Make process events configurable as a module Matt Helsley
2006-06-14  0:54   ` Chase Venters
2006-06-14  1:18     ` [Lse-tech] " Matt Helsley
2006-06-13 23:54 ` [PATCH 05/11] Task watchers: Allow task watchers to block Matt Helsley
2006-06-13 23:54 ` [PATCH 06/11] Task watchers: Register audit task watcher Matt Helsley
2006-06-14 14:46   ` Alexander Viro
2006-06-14 23:28     ` Matt Helsley
2006-06-13 23:54 ` [PATCH 07/11] Task watchers: Register per-task delay accounting " Matt Helsley
2006-06-14  3:31   ` Shailabh Nagar
2006-06-14 22:52     ` Matt Helsley
2006-06-13 23:54 ` [PATCH 08/11] Task watchers: Register profile as a " Matt Helsley
2006-06-14  0:59   ` Chase Venters
2006-06-14  1:16     ` [Lse-tech] " Matt Helsley
2006-06-13 23:55 ` [PATCH 09/11] Task watchers: Add support for per-task watchers Matt Helsley
2006-06-20  5:28   ` Peter Williams
2006-06-20 22:56     ` [Lse-tech] " Matt Helsley
2006-06-20 23:15       ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-20 23:23         ` Peter Williams
2006-06-21  1:20         ` Matt Helsley
2006-06-21  1:46           ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-21  1:55             ` Peter Williams
2006-06-21 13:01               ` Peter Williams
2006-06-21 13:23                 ` Peter Williams
2006-06-21  2:28             ` Matt Helsley
2006-06-20 23:21       ` Peter Williams
2006-06-13 23:55 ` [PATCH 10/11] Task watchers: Register semundo task watcher Matt Helsley
2006-06-13 23:55 ` Matt Helsley [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1150242906.21787.151.camel@stark \
    --to=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=jes@sgi.com \
    --cc=jtk@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=nagar@watson.ibm.com \
    --cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox