Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH 08/11] Task watchers: Register profile as a task watcher

[Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>]

On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 19:59 -0500, Chase Venters wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 June 2006 18:54, Matt Helsley wrote:
> 
> >  	switch (type) {
> > -		case PROFILE_TASK_EXIT:
> > -			err = blocking_notifier_chain_register(
> > -					&task_exit_notifier, n);
> > -			break;
> >  		case PROFILE_MUNMAP:
> >  			err = blocking_notifier_chain_register(
> >  					&munmap_notifier, n);
> >  			break;
> >  	}
> 
> 	if (type == PROFILE_MUNMAP)
> 
> ?
>
> > @@ -140,14 +130,10 @@ int profile_event_register(enum profile_
> >  int profile_event_unregister(enum profile_type type, struct notifier_block
> > * n) {
> >  	int err = -EINVAL;
> >
> >  	switch (type) {
> > -		case PROFILE_TASK_EXIT:
> > -			err = blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(
> > -					&task_exit_notifier, n);
> > -			break;
> >  		case PROFILE_MUNMAP:
> >  			err = blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(
> >  					&munmap_notifier, n);
> >  			break;
> >  	}
> 
> Same...
> 
> Thanks,
> Chase

Hmm. Perhaps I ought to get rid of the condition and enum entirely then
change the names of the functions to profile_mmmap() and
profile_munmap().

	It really depends on what additional changes, if any, are expected
here. Since I don't have any plans to further modify profiling beyond
what I've outlined in these patches I'm not sure what the best course is
here.

Thanks,
	-Matt Helsley