From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964887AbWFSU7F (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2006 16:59:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964842AbWFSU7F (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2006 16:59:05 -0400 Received: from www.osadl.org ([213.239.205.134]:50606 "EHLO mail.tglx.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964886AbWFSU7D (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2006 16:59:03 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ktime/hrtimer: fix kernel-doc comments From: Thomas Gleixner Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de To: "Randy.Dunlap" Cc: lkml , akpm , mingo@elte.hr In-Reply-To: <20060619130948.6ea3998c.rdunlap@xenotime.net> References: <20060619130948.6ea3998c.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:00:22 +0200 Message-Id: <1150750822.29299.86.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Randy, On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 13:09 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > From: Randy Dunlap > > Fix kernel-doc formatting in ktime.h and hrtimer.[ch] files. > > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap > --- > include/linux/hrtimer.h | 3 --- > include/linux/ktime.h | 8 -------- > kernel/hrtimer.c | 11 +---------- > 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-) > > --- linux-2617-pv.orig/include/linux/ktime.h > +++ linux-2617-pv/include/linux/ktime.h > @@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ typedef union { > > /** > * ktime_set - Set a ktime_t variable from a seconds/nanoseconds value > - * > * @secs: seconds to set > * @nsecs: nanoseconds to set > * <.....> Is there any real reason for doing this, expect for removing the blank comment lines ? My personal preference is to keep that line, as it makes it easier to read. But as always: de gustibus non est disputandum :) tglx