From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.17-rt1
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 20:57:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1150937848.2754.379.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060618070641.GA6759@elte.hu>
On Sun, 2006-06-18 at 09:06 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i have released the 2.6.17-rt1 tree, which can be downloaded from the
> usual place:
>
> http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/
>
> this is a fixes-only release: merged to 2.6.17-final and smaller fixes.
>
> to build a 2.6.17-rc6-rt1 tree, the following patches should be applied:
>
> http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.17.tar.bz2
> http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/patch-2.6.17-rt1
I'm getting some strange latency tracer output on a dual core AMD box.
Why does it start at 404us?
Lee
preemption latency trace v1.1.5 on 2.6.17-rt1-smp-latency-trace
--------------------------------------------------------------------
latency: 415 us, #26/26, CPU#1 | (M:rt VP:0, KP:0, SP:1 HP:1 #P:2)
-----------------
| task: kjournald-2043 (uid:0 nice:-5 policy:0 rt_prio:0)
-----------------
_------=> CPU#
/ _-----=> irqs-off
| / _----=> need-resched
|| / _---=> hardirq/softirq
||| / _--=> preempt-depth
|||| /
||||| delay
cmd pid ||||| time | caller
\ / ||||| \ | /
<idle>-0 1Dn.1 404us : smp_reschedule_interrupt (reschedule_interrupt)
<idle>-0 1.n.1 405us : __exit_idle (cpu_idle)
<idle>-0 1.n.1 405us : atomic_notifier_call_chain (__exit_idle)
<idle>-0 1.n.1 406us : rcu_read_lock (atomic_notifier_call_chain)
<idle>-0 1Dn.1 406us : rcu_read_lock (0 0 badc)
<idle>-0 1Dn.1 406us : rcu_read_lock (ffff810002eb7228 0 badc)
<idle>-0 1.n.1 406us : rcu_read_unlock (atomic_notifier_call_chain)
<idle>-0 1Dn.1 407us : rcu_read_unlock (ffff810002eb7228 0 1)
<idle>-0 1Dn.1 407us : rcu_read_unlock (0 0 0)
<idle>-0 1Dn.. 407us : __schedule (cpu_idle)
<idle>-0 1Dn.. 407us : profile_hit (__schedule)
<idle>-0 1Dn.1 408us : sched_clock (__schedule)
<idle>-0 1Dn.1 408us : _raw_spin_lock_irq (__schedule)
<idle>-0 1Dn.2 409us : recalc_task_prio (__schedule)
<idle>-0 1Dn.2 410us : effective_prio (recalc_task_prio)
<idle>-0 1Dn.2 410us : effective_prio <<...>-2043> (-10 -10)
<idle>-0 1D..2 412us : __switch_to (thread_return)
<...>-2043 1D..2 413us : thread_return <<idle>-0> (20 -10)
<...>-2043 1D..2 413us : _raw_spin_unlock_irq (thread_return)
<...>-2043 1...1 413us : constant_test_bit (_raw_spin_unlock_irq)
<...>-2043 1...1 413us : trace_stop_sched_switched (thread_return)
<...>-2043 1D..1 414us : _raw_spin_lock (trace_stop_sched_switched)
<...>-2043 1D..2 414us : trace_stop_sched_switched <<...>-2043> (110 1)
<...>-2043 1D..2 415us : thread_return (thread_return)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-22 0:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-18 7:06 2.6.17-rt1 Ingo Molnar
2006-06-18 16:13 ` 2.6.17-rt1 Michal Piotrowski
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606201656230.11643@localhost.localdomain>
2006-06-20 15:13 ` Why can't I set the priority of softirq-hrt? (Re: 2.6.17-rt1) Thomas Gleixner
2006-06-20 17:09 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-06-20 16:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-06-20 21:16 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-06-20 20:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-06-20 23:19 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-06-20 16:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-06-20 18:12 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-06-20 17:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-06-20 21:26 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-06-20 20:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-06-21 8:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-06-21 11:05 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-06-21 15:43 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-06-21 15:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-06-21 16:37 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-06-21 15:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-06-21 17:14 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-06-21 16:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-06-21 18:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-22 10:28 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-06-21 21:29 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-06-21 20:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-06-21 23:35 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-06-22 7:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-06-22 10:32 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-06-22 13:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-06-22 13:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-06-22 14:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-06-22 14:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-06-22 14:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-06-22 18:06 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-06-22 18:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-06-23 11:23 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-06-23 11:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-07-03 11:48 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-06-21 8:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-06-21 11:03 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-06-22 0:57 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2006-06-22 2:51 ` More weird latency trace output (was 2.6.17-rt1) Lee Revell
2006-06-23 1:24 ` Lee Revell
2006-06-24 22:15 ` Lee Revell
2006-06-24 22:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-24 22:31 ` Lee Revell
2006-06-24 23:49 ` Lee Revell
2006-06-23 20:56 ` 2.6.17-rt1 - mm_struct leak Vernon Mauery
2006-06-24 9:24 ` Mark Hounschell
2006-06-24 9:32 ` Mark Hounschell
2006-06-30 16:02 ` [PATCH -RT]Re: " Vernon Mauery
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1150937848.2754.379.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox