From: Paul Fulghum <paulkf@microgate.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: "Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" <lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br>,
Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Serial-Core: USB-Serial port current issues.
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:49:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1151369349.2600.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060626222628.GC29325@suse.de>
On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 15:26 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 02:28:42PM -0300, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:29:40 +0100
> > Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > |
> > | Consider this scenario with what you're proposing:
> > |
> > | thread irq
> > |
> > | take mutex
> > | get_mctrl
> > | cts changes state
> > | take port lock
> > | mctrl state read
> > | tty->hw_stopped changed state
> > | release port lock
> > | releaes mutex
> > | take port lock
> > | update tty->hw_stopped
> > | release port lock
> > |
> > | Now, tty->hw_stopped does not reflect the hardware state, which will be
> > | buggy and can cause a loss of transmission.
> > |
> > | I'm not sure what to suggest on this one since for USB drivers you do
> > | need to be able to sleep in this method... but for UARTs you must not.
What about this ugly fragment?
(assuming get_mctrl not called from IRQ)
take mutex
take port lock
again:
save local copy of icount
release port lock
get_mctrl
take port lock
if (icount changed)
goto again
update tty->hw_stopped
release port lock
release mutex
--
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-27 0:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-13 22:28 Serial-Core: USB-Serial port current issues Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2006-06-14 15:28 ` Russell King
2006-06-14 20:38 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2006-06-15 0:53 ` Pete Zaitcev
2006-06-15 13:29 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2006-06-15 16:07 ` Greg KH
2006-06-15 16:21 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2006-06-20 19:11 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2006-06-21 2:32 ` Pete Zaitcev
2006-06-21 16:35 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2006-06-21 16:43 ` Russell King
2006-06-21 21:15 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2006-06-22 8:29 ` Russell King
2006-06-23 17:28 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2006-06-26 22:26 ` Greg KH
2006-06-27 0:49 ` Paul Fulghum [this message]
2006-07-04 19:42 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2006-07-04 19:50 ` Pete Zaitcev
2006-07-04 20:36 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2006-07-05 13:40 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Paul Fulghum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1151369349.2600.19.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=paulkf@microgate.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=zaitcev@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox