From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932683AbWF1Bh3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2006 21:37:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932685AbWF1Bh3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2006 21:37:29 -0400 Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.142]:61629 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932683AbWF1Bh2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2006 21:37:28 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/3] Process events biarch bug: New process events connector value From: Matt Helsley To: "Chandra S. Seetharaman" Cc: LKML , Evgeniy Polyakov , Guillaume Thouvenin , Michael Kerrisk In-Reply-To: <1151452465.1412.35.camel@linuxchandra> References: <20060627112644.804066367@localhost.localdomain> <1151408975.21787.1815.camel@stark> <1151435679.1412.16.camel@linuxchandra> <1151444382.21787.1858.camel@stark> <1151452465.1412.35.camel@linuxchandra> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:29:11 -0700 Message-Id: <1151458151.21787.1913.camel@stark> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 16:54 -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 14:39 -0700, Matt Helsley wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 12:14 -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > > > Is there a reason why the # of listeners part is removed (basically the > > > LISTEN/IGNORE) ? and why as part of this patch ? > > > > Michael Kerrisk had some objections to LISTEN/IGNORE and I've been > > looking into making a connector function that would replace them. They > > exist primarily to improve performance by avoiding the memory allocation > > in cn_netlink_send() when there are no listeners. > > If it not related this bug, can you please separate them. > > OK, I'll separate it for the next submission. Cheers, -Matt Helsley