From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751352AbWF3AoO (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:44:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751370AbWF3AoL (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:44:11 -0400 Received: from viper.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.4]:13226 "HELO viper.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751352AbWF3AoH (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:44:07 -0400 Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] let CONFIG_SECCOMP default to n From: Lee Revell To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar In-Reply-To: <20060629192121.GC19712@stusta.de> References: <20060629192121.GC19712@stusta.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:44:06 -0400 Message-Id: <1151628246.22380.58.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 21:21 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > This patch was already sent on: > - 26 Jun 2006 > - 27 Apr 2006 > - 19 Apr 2006 > - 11 Apr 2006 > - 10 Mar 2006 > - 29 Jan 2006 > - 21 Jan 2006 3 days ago? That seems a bit silly. Why didn't you just ping Andrew on it? Andrew, what's the status of this? Can we get an ACK or a NACK before this starts getting reposted every day? ;-) Lee