From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750720AbWGCGbw (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jul 2006 02:31:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750732AbWGCGbw (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jul 2006 02:31:52 -0400 Received: from theorix.CeNTIE.NET.au ([202.9.6.84]:47337 "HELO theorix.centie.net.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750720AbWGCGbv (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jul 2006 02:31:51 -0400 Subject: Re: Suspend to RAM regression tracked down From: Jean-Marc Valin To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, Linux Kernel , venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com In-Reply-To: <44A8B2FC.6080806@goop.org> References: <1151837268.5358.10.camel@idefix.homelinux.org> <44A80B20.1090702@goop.org> <1151880764.5358.32.camel@idefix.homelinux.org> <44A8B2FC.6080806@goop.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 16:31:47 +1000 Message-Id: <1151908307.8325.3.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 23:02 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > > Any link to the patch and the thread about the problem (if any)? Also, > > was the race introduced in 2.6.12-rc5-git6? If not, it's a completely > > different problem because my machine worked fine with 2.6.12-rc5-git5. > > > > It's in the thread on the cpufreq list titled "ondemand vs suspend"; > Venkatesh Pallipadi posted the patch. Just read the thread and it's not clear to me whether it's the same problem. Venkatesh, does the thread describe the same as this bug: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6166 which appeared in 2.6.12-rc5-git6 or is it a separate problem? Jean-Marc