From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751050AbWGFXe3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jul 2006 19:34:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751051AbWGFXe3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jul 2006 19:34:29 -0400 Received: from mx.pathscale.com ([64.160.42.68]:11962 "EHLO mx.pathscale.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751049AbWGFXe2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jul 2006 19:34:28 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 38 of 39] IB/ipath - More changes to support InfiniPath on PowerPC 970 systems From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: akpm@osdl.org, rdreier@cisco.com, mst@mellanox.co.il, openib-general@openib.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1152225421.9862.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1152225421.9862.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 16:34:27 -0700 Message-Id: <1152228867.24748.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.5) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 08:37 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > +int ipath_unordered_wc(void) > > +{ > > + return 1; > > +} > > How is the above providing any kind of serialisation ? It's not intended to; it tells the *caller* whether to do it.