From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750951AbWGHE6d (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 00:58:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751193AbWGHE6d (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 00:58:33 -0400 Received: from beauty.rexursive.com ([203.171.74.242]:28825 "EHLO beauty.rexursive.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750951AbWGHE6c (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 00:58:32 -0400 Subject: Re: uswsusp history lesson [was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: swsusp / suspend2 reliability] From: Bojan Smojver To: Pavel Machek Cc: Nigel Cunningham , Avuton Olrich , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jan@rychter.com, Olivier Galibert , suspend2-devel@lists.suspend2.net, grundig In-Reply-To: <20060708002826.GD1700@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20060627133321.GB3019@elf.ucw.cz> <20060707215656.GA30353@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <20060707232523.GC1746@elf.ucw.cz> <200607080933.12372.ncunningham@linuxmail.org> <20060708002826.GD1700@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2006 14:58:28 +1000 Message-Id: <1152334708.2497.10.camel@coyote.rexursive.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.5) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 02:28 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > uswsusp makes suspend2 obsolete, and suspend2 now looks > misdesigned. It puts too much stuff into the kernel, you know that > already. In order for uswsusp to make Suspend2 obsolete, it would have to *at least* support what Suspend2 does. Unfortunately, that isn't the case right now. When can we expect all that in uswsusp? -- Bojan