From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751308AbWGHLLW (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 07:11:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751310AbWGHLLW (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 07:11:22 -0400 Received: from beauty.rexursive.com ([203.171.74.242]:26285 "EHLO beauty.rexursive.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751308AbWGHLLV (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 07:11:21 -0400 Subject: Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: uswsusp history lesson From: Bojan Smojver To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Jan Rychter , Pavel Machek , Avuton Olrich , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Olivier Galibert , suspend2-devel@lists.suspend2.net, grundig , Nigel Cunningham In-Reply-To: <1152355318.3120.26.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> References: <20060627133321.GB3019@elf.ucw.cz> <20060707215656.GA30353@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <20060707232523.GC1746@elf.ucw.cz> <200607080933.12372.ncunningham@linuxmail.org> <20060708002826.GD1700@elf.ucw.cz> <1152353698.2555.11.camel@coyote.rexursive.com> <1152355318.3120.26.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Rexursive Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2006 21:11:17 +1000 Message-Id: <1152357077.2088.4.camel@beast.rexursive.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.5) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 12:41 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > What is worse, these suspend systems will inevitable have > different requirements on the rest of the kernel, and will thus > complicate the heck out of it for the rest of the developers. My (user level) understanding is that built in swsusp and Suspend2 use the same (or almost the same) machinery in the rest of the kernel to do the work. I'm sure Nigel, Pavel and others can confirm or deny this. > No fancy shnazy GUI inside the kernel, but SIMPLE. AFAIK, none of the solutions have GUI inside the kernel. -- Bojan