From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751314AbWGHWcL (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 18:32:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751317AbWGHWcK (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 18:32:10 -0400 Received: from beauty.rexursive.com ([203.171.74.242]:62666 "EHLO beauty.rexursive.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751314AbWGHWcJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jul 2006 18:32:09 -0400 Subject: Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: uswsusp history lesson From: Bojan Smojver To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Jan Rychter , Pavel Machek , Avuton Olrich , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Olivier Galibert , suspend2-devel@lists.suspend2.net, grundig , Nigel Cunningham In-Reply-To: <1152364743.3120.42.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> References: <20060627133321.GB3019@elf.ucw.cz> <20060707215656.GA30353@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <20060707232523.GC1746@elf.ucw.cz> <200607080933.12372.ncunningham@linuxmail.org> <20060708002826.GD1700@elf.ucw.cz> <1152353698.2555.11.camel@coyote.rexursive.com> <1152355318.3120.26.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1152357077.2088.4.camel@beast.rexursive.com> <1152364743.3120.42.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2006 08:32:06 +1000 Message-Id: <1152397926.2582.3.camel@coyote.rexursive.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.5) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 15:19 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > so they're almost the same conceptually... That's even more reason to go > for one unified approach. I couldn't agree more. Of course, we should have a better of the two in-kernel implementations: Suspend2. But that's the problem - it's not going to happen. -- Bojan